Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

The most important factors affecting onion rod digger performance are the shape of the rod and the ratio of peripheral speed to translational speed (kinematic index). This study investigated the effect of these parameters on nthe performance of a rod onion harvester using a split-block randomized complete-block design with three replicates for three rod shapes (round, hexagonal, rectangular) and rod kinematic indices of 0.16, 1, 1.15, 1.30 and 1.44. In each experiment, the draft force and drawbar power for the rod and complete harvester, rotational torque and total required power for the rod, and the percentage of damage were determined. The results showed that rod shape had no significant effect on draft force, drawbar power (averaging 10571 N and 5285 W, respectively) and percentage of damage (averaging 1.98%); maximum torque and rotational power (averaging 64 N.m and 2394 W, respectively) were observed for the rectangular shaped rod. The maximum values for draft force and drawbar power (12018.7 N and 6009.3 W, respectively) were in the 0.16 kinematic index; the minimum values (9645.2 N and 4822.2 W, respectively) were in the 1.15 kinematic index. Maximum torque and rotational power (85 N and 3327.8 W, respectively) occurred for the rectangular shaped rod in the 0.16 and 1.44 kinematic indices, respectively. The results showed that, for minimum onion damage (priority) and power consumed, the best kinematic index was 1.15. The results of this research show that the rectangular rod shape in hard soil and the round rod shape in soft soil facilitated penetration; both occured in the 1.15 kinematic index. The total consumed power was from 3.5 to 3.8 KW per m of working width.

Keywords

Anon. 1982. Evaluation Report. Tested at Humboldt. Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute. ISSN
0383-3445.
Balls, R. C. 1985. Horticultural Engineering Technology: Field Machinery. Macmillan Pub.
Chesson, J. H., Johnson, H. and Brooks, C. R. 1978. Mechanical harvesting investigations for fresh market onions. T. ASAE. 21(5): 838-842.
Harrison, H. P. and Atkins, R. P. 1981a. Soil reacting forces for a rod weeder from field measurements.
T. ASAE. 24(3): 590-592. 
Harrison, H. P. and Atkins, R. P. 1981b. Rod weeder Soil Forces from Field Measurements. T. ASAE. Paper No. 79-1040.
Harrison, H. P. and Bai, X. 1990. Rod weeder soil reaction force for different rod shapes and speeds.
T. ASAE. 33(5): 1445-1448.
Hunt, D. 1977. Farm Power and Machinery Management: Laboratory Manual and Workbook. Iowa State University Press.
Klenin, N. I., Popov, I. F. and Sakun, V. A. 1986. Agricultural Machines: Theory of Operation, Computation of Controlling Parameters and the Conditions of Operation. Russian Translation.
Series 31.
Kydd, H. D., Frehlich, G. E. and Boyden, A. R. 1984. Tillage power requirements in western Canada. ASAE. Paper No. 84-1027.
Mayberry, K. S. 2000. Market Onions. US Cooperative Extension Sample Cost to Establish and Produce. University of California and the United States Department of Agricultural Cooperating.
Mozafari, M. and Kazemeinkhah, K. 2000. Design, development and evaluation of suitable onion harvester for small farms (laboratory scale). Final Research Report. Agricultural Research and Education Organization. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Jahad Agricultural Ministry. (in Farsi)
Payne, P. C. J. 1956. The relationship between the mechanical properties of soil and the performance of simple cultivation implements. J. Agric. Eng. 1, 23-50.
Srivastava, A., Goering, C. and Rohrbach, R. 1993. Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE).
Taki, O. 2011. Development of a front-mounted rod-digger for harvesting non-row basis onions. Annual Research Report. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Isfahan. (in Farsi)
Viramontes, J. A. B. 1980. Harvester with Mechanical Rod Weeder and Soil Agitator. United State Patent. No. 4232745.