Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

An experimental system based on acoustic technology was set up to nondestructively determine the ripeness of two export melon varieties (Zard-Eyvanekey, Sousky-Sabz). The system comprised a mechanical impulse device, sound sensor (sound level meter), recording signal equipment and the melon patch. Fruit was excited by the pendulum and the response signal was detected by non-contact sensing and processed. TSS, moisture content, acoustic and sensory levels were measured at five stages of ripening. Results indicated that, as ripening progressed, sound pressure, mass and TSS increased while resonance frequency and elastic modulus decreased for both varieties. The resonance frequency for Zard-Eyvanekey decreased from 132.25 to 111.33 Hz and for Sousky-Sabz from 128.91 to 111.33 Hz. Sound pressure increased from 49.21 to 57.74 dB for Zard-Eyvanekey and from 49.66 to 58.22 dB for Sousky-Sabz. A sensory evaluation test determined that the period of optimum ripeness of Zard-Eyvanekey was at 113.34 Hz and 56.93 dB and for Sousky-Sabz was at 114.26 Hz and 56.25 dB. Changes in resonance frequency and sound pressure were slight and similar for both varieties. These results can be useful for the design of nondestructive sound systems to detect melon ripeness.

Keywords

Abbott, J. A., Lu, R., Upchurch, L. B. and Stroshine, L. R. 1997. Technologies for non-destructive quality evaluation of fruits and vegetables. Hort. Rev. 20, 1-120.
Abbott, J. A., Childers, N. F., Bachman, G. S., Fitzgerald, J. V. and Matusik, F. J. 1968. Acoustic vibration for detecting textural quality of apples. Proc. Amer.  Soc. Hort. Sci. 93, 725-737.
Anon. 2003. Compression Test of Food Materials of Convex Shape. ASAE S368.4 DEC2000 (R2006).
Anon. 2003. Descriptors for Melon (Cucumis melo L.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) . Rome. Italy.
Cooke, J. R. 1972. An interpretation of the resonant behavior of intact fruits and vegetables. Transactions ASAE. 15(6): 1075-1080.
De Belie, N., Schotte, S., Lammertyn, J., Nicolai, B. and De Baerdemaeker, J. 2000. Firmness changes of pear fruit before and after harvest with the acoustic impulse response technique. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 77(2): 183-191.
Diezma-Iglesias, B., Ruiz-Altisent, M. and Barreiro, P. 2004. Detection of internal quality in seedless watermelon by acoustic impulse response. Biosystems Eng. 88(2): 221-230.
Finney, E. E. 1972. Vibration techniques for testing fruit firmness. J. Texture Stud. 3(3): 263-283.
Hassan-Beygi, S. R., Ghaebi, S. M. and Arabhosseini, A. 2009. Some physico-mechanical properties of apricot fruit, pit and kernel of Ordubad variety. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript 1459. Vol. XI.
Hernández Gómez, A., Garcia Pereira, A. and Wang, J. 2006. Acoustic impulse response potential to measure mandarin fruit ripeness during storage. Revista Ciencias Tecnicas Agropecuarias, 15(4): 24-30.
Hernández Gómez, A., Garcia Pereira, A., Wang, J. and Yong, H. 2005. Acoustic testing for peach fruit ripeness evaluation during peach storage stage. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias. 14(2): 28-34.
Jancsok, P. T., Clijmans, L., Nicola, B. M. and De Baerdemaeker, J. 2001. Investigation of the effect of shape on the acoustic response of "Conference" pears by finite element modeling. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 23(1): 1-12.
Lu, Q., Wang, J., Hernández Gómez, A. and Garcia Pereira, A. 2009. Evaluation of tomato quality during storage by acoustic impulse response. J. Food Process. Pres. 33, 356-370.
Mahmoudi, A. 2006. Development of a suitable algorithm using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) for sorting of pistachio nuts with closed shells using impact acoustics. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Tehran. Karaj. Iran (in Farsi)