Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Irrigation management includes cut-off dates, water volume and irrigation frequency control to influence the yield and post-harvest status of garlic. In this study, the effect of cut-off dates and irrigation levels on garlic were investigated over three years using a completely randomized block arranged in a split plot experimental design consisting of three levels of irrigation (75%, 100%, 125% water use) as the main plot and three irrigation cut-off dates (current date of cut-off, one week prior to and one week subsequent to the prevalent date for Hamedan garlic farms) as the sub-plot with three replications. After harvesting, the clove weight, bulb diameter, clove and skin numbers and yield were measured. The greatest and least clove weights were obtained for 125% water used in the third (47.5 g) and first (39.8 g) cut-off dates, respectively. Clove weight and bulb diameter for the third date increased and skin number decreased. The greatest yield was obtained for 125% water and at the first cut-off date (10450 kg/ha).  The differences were not significant for the other treatments, except for 75% water used at the third cut-off date (8622 kg/ha). The greatest WUE was found for 75% water at the first cut-off date (9.7 kg/m3). As a result of this study, the 75% level of irrigation and the first cut-off date were shown to be the most suitable.

Keywords

Anon. 1996. Garlic: An economic assessment of the feasibility of providing multiple-peril crop insurance. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Anon. 2003. Selected basic statistics of Hamedan, Jihad-e-Agriculture. Deputy of Hamedan Jihad-e-Agriculture. (in Farsi)
Anon. 2007. Unpublished data. Deputy of Hamedan meteorology.
Anon. 2007. A pest management strategic plan for garlic production in California. California Garlic and Onion Research Advisory Board (CGORAB), California Specialty Crops Council (CSCC). P: 46.
Allen, R., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Paper No. 56. Rome, Italy.
Bodnar, J., Schumacher, B. and Uyenaka, J. 1990. Garlic production.
Cantwell, M., Voss, R., Hanson, B., May, D. and Rice, B. 2000. Water and fertilizer management for garlic: Productivity, nutrient and water use efficiency and post-harvest quality. Proceedings of the California ASA / Plant and Soil Conference, January 20. P: 16.
Choi, J.K., Ban, C.D. and Kwon, Y.S. 1980. Effects of the amount and times of irrigation on bulbing and growth in garlic. Research Reports of the Office of Rural Development, Horticulture and Sericulture, Suwon. 22, 20-30.
Duranti, A. and Barbieri, G. 1986. The response of garlic (Allium sativum L.) for storage to variations in irrigation regim and in planting density. Rivista della orto florofrutticoltura Italiana. 70(4):285-298.
Hanson, B., May, D., Voss, R., Cantwell, M. and Rice, B. 2003. Response of garlic to irrigation water. Agric. Water Manag. 58, 29-43.
Malmir, A. 1999. Investigation and determination of complex methods at damage reduction of D. ulula moth larva. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Hamedan. Final Research Report. No. 79/62. (in Farsi)
Panchal, G.N., Modhwadia, M.M., Patel, J.C., Sadaria, SG. and Patel, B.S. 1992. Response of garlic (Allium sativum) to irrigation, nitrogen and phosphorus. Indian J. Agron. 37 (2): 397-398.
Rezvani, S., Mirzaee, M., and Bayat, F. 2011. Determination of water deficit sensibility in four stages of sugar beet growth in Hamedan. Iranian J. lrrig. Drain. 4 (3). (in Farsi)

Shainberg I. and Oster, J.D. 1978. Quality of irrigation water : IIIC Publication No. 2, Volcani Center. 65 pp. Translated by Alizadeh, A.

Zepp, G., Harwood, J. and Somwaru, A. 1999. Garlic: An economic assessment of the feasibility of providing multiple-peril crop insurance. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.