Development of an Ultrasonic System and Evaluation of Effective Parameters in Ultrasonic Measurement of Agricultural Products

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Ultrasonic testing (UT), a nondestructive testing (NDT) method, is under development for quality determination of agricultural products, although it has long been used in the food industry. Determination and measurement of product quality are important in modern agricultural research. Noninvasive/nondestructive quality determination is a novel aspect of the postharvest process in which parameters measured by NDT methods are correlated with product quality. Reviews show that the “through-transmission method” is better than other UT methods for examination of agricultural products. The main parameters of the through-transmission method are wave velocity and attenuation. In this research, a UT system was designed and developed to analyze a signal passing through a product. The system consisted of a set of fabricated pulser/receiver units with ultrasonic transducers, control software and a data acquisition system. The system semi-automatically determined the two important ultrasonic parameters of wave velocity and attenuation coefficient by signal processing. The effect of couplant type, contact force, enveloping, delay line, and sample thickness were investigated using the signal. Several types of fruits and vegetables having differing tissue types (apple, potato, nectarine, banana, carrot, cucumber and quince) were selected for testing. The thicknesses of the samples were 5cm to 12cm. Results demonstrated that using couplant, enveloping signal, low contact force (5N) and suitable sample thickness, the ultrasonic measurement system could measure ultrasonic parameters effectively at a suitable response speed. The ultrasonic wave was transmitted through most of these products using a pulse signal with 40kHz excited frequency at low power. The precision of the time-of-flight measurement increased with enveloping of the transmitted signal.

Keywords

20.1001.1.26454531.1388.10.1.3.5

References

Abbott, J. A. 1999. Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15, 207-225.

Abbott, J. A., Lu, R., Upchurch, B. L. and Stroshine, R. L. 1997. Technologies for nondestructive quality evaluation of fruits and vegetables. Hortic. Rev. 20, 1-120.

Bechar, A., Mizrach, A., Barreiro, P. and Landahl, S.2005. Determination of Mealiness in Apples using Ultrasonic Measurements. Biosys. Eng.91(3): 329-334.

Butz, P., Hofmann, C. and Tauscher, B. 2005. Recent developments in noninvasive techniques for fresh fruit and vegetable quality analysis. J. Food Science. 70(9): 131-141.

Cartz, L. 1998. Nondestructive testing, Radiography, Ultrasonics, Liquid Penetrant, Magnetic Particle, Eddy Current. ASM International. USA.

Cheng, Y. and Haugh, C. G. 1994. Detecting Hollow Heart in Potatoes Using Ultrasound. Trans. ASAE. 37(1): 217-222.

Gaete-Garretón, L., Yolanda Vargas-Hernndez, Y., Cristian León-Vidal, C. and Alex Pettorino-Besnier, A. 2005. A novel noninvasive ultrasonic method to assess avocado ripening. J. Food Sci. 70(3):187-191.

Gaonkar, A. G. 1995. Food Processing Recent Developments. Elsevier Science. Amsterdam. Netherlands.

Hurng, H. Y., Lu, F. M. and Ay, C. 2007. Evaluating and modeling physiological tissue texture of mango immersed in water by using ultrasonic. Inter. Agric Eng. J. 16(1-2), 1-13.

Kim, K. B., Jung, H. M., Kim, M. S. and Kim, G. S. 2004. Evaluation of fruit firmness by ultrasonic measurement. Advances in Nondestructive Evaluation. PT 1-3 Key Engineering Materials. 270-273: 1049-1054. Part 1-3.

Jivanuwong, S. 1998. Nondestructive detection of hollow heart in potatoes using ultrasonics. M.Sc. Thesis in Biological Systems Engineering. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Mizrach, A. 2007. Nondestructive ultrasonic monitoring of tomato quality during shelf-life storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 46, 271-274.

Mizrach, A., Galili, N. and Rosenhouse, G. 1989. Determination of fruit and vegetable properties by ultrasonic excitation. Trans. ASAE. 32(6): 2053-2058.

Mizrach, A., Schmilovitch, Z., Avidan, B. 2006. Maturity Measurements of Olive Fruits using Acoustic and Compression Methods. CIGR. World Congress of Agricultural Engineering for a Better World. Sep. 3-7. Berlin. Germany.

Mizrach, A., Galili, N., Teitel D. C. and Rosenhouse, G. 1994. Ultrasonic evaluation of some ripening parameters of autumn and winter-grown ‘Galia’ melons. Scientia Hortic. 56(4): 291-297.

Mizrach, A., Flitsanov, U., Schmilovitch, Z. and Fuchs, Y. 1999. Determination of mango physiological indices by mechanical wave analysis. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 16,179-186.

Mizrach, A., Galili, N., Gan-mor, S., Flitsanov, U., and Prigozin, I. 1996. Model of ultrasonic parameters to assess avocado properties and shelf life. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 65, 261-267.

Mizrach, A., Bechar, A., Grinshpon, Y., Hofman, A., Egozi, H. and Rosenfeld, L. 2003. Ultrasonic classification of mealiness in apples. Trans. ASAE. 46(2): 397–400.

Prakash, M. N. K. and Ramana, K. V. R. 2003. Ultrasound and its application in the food industry. J. Food Sci. Technol. 40(6): 563-570.

Porteous, R. l., Muir, A. Y. and Wastie, R. L. 1981. The identification of diseases and defects in potato tubers from measurements optical spectral reflectance. Agric. Engin. Res. 26, 151-160.

Raj, B., Rajendran, V. and Palanichamy, P. 2007. Science and Technology of Ultrasonic. Alpha Science International Ltd. Pangbourne. U. K.

Rose, J. L. 2004. Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media. Cambridge University Pub. Cambridge. UK.

Sarkar, N. and Wolfe, R. R. 1983. Potential of ultrasonic measurements in food quality evaluation. Trans. ASAE. 26(2): 624-629.

Self, G. K., Ordozgoiti, E., Povey, M. J. W. and Wainwright, H. 1994. Ultrasonic evaluation of ripening avocado flesh. Postharvest Biol.Technol. 4, 111-116.

Shewfelt, R. L. 1999. What is quality?. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15(3): 197-200.

Verlinden,B. E., Smedt, V. D. and Nicola, B. M. 2004. Evaluation of ultrasonic wave propagation tomeasure chilling injury in tomatoes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32, 109-113.

Hedrick, W. H, Heykes, D. L. and Starchman, D. E. 2005. Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation. 4^th Ed. Elsevier Mosby. Philadelphia. US.

Subramanian, C. V. 2006. Practical Ultrasonic. Alpha Science International Ltd. Oxford. UK.

Food Engineering Research

Development of an Ultrasonic System and Evaluation of Effective Parameters in Ultrasonic Measurement of Agricultural Products

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
January 0
Pages 27-48

Development of an Ultrasonic System and Evaluation of Effective Parameters in Ultrasonic Measurement of Agricultural Products

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1January 0Pages 27-48

Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
January 0
Pages 27-48