Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

The mechanical strength of cumin seed and the effects of moisture content, seed size, speed and direction of loading on the force and energy required to fracture cumin seed were investigated. The results showed that moisture and loading direction were significant at the 1% level on the force and energy required to fracture cumin seed. The effects of seed size on force and loading speed on energy were also significant at the 1% level. Increasing moisture content decreased mechanical strength and increased elasticity under loading. The energy absorption capacity of wet seed was higher than that of dry seed and led to increased seed strength under loading. The highest energy absorption (15.31mJ) was found for small seeds at 15% moisture content under horizontal loading and the lowest energy absorption (1.72mJ) was found for large seeds at 5.7% moisture content under vertical loading. Small seeds with 5.7% moisture content under horizontal loading had the highest mechanical strength and large seeds at 15% moisture content under vertical loading had the lowest mechanical strength.

Keywords

Anon. 2006. Agricultural Statistical Bulletin. Ministry of Jihad-Agriculture. Khorasan Organization. (in Farsi)
Bilanski, W. K. 1996. Damage resistance of seed grains. Trans. ASAE. 19(2): 360-363.
Kafi, M., Rashed, M., Kocheki, A. and Molafilabi, A. 2002. Cumin. Mashhad University Pub. (in Farsi) 
Kamst, G. F., bonazzi, C., Vasseur, J. and Bimbenet, J. J. 2002. Effect of deformation rate and moisture content on the mechanical properties of rice grains. Trans. ASAE. 45(1): 145-151.
Khazae, J. 2003. Force requirement for pulling off chick pea pods as well as fracture resistance of chick pea pods and grains. Ph. D. Thesis. Power and Machinery Dep. Tehran University. Tehran. Iran. (in Farsi) 
Kirk, I. W. and Mcleod, H. E. 1967. Cotton seed rupture from static energy and impact velocity. Trans. ASAE. 10(2): 217-219.
Konak, M., Carman, K. and Aydin, C. 2002. Physical properties of chick pea seeds. Bio. Eng. 82(1):
73-78.
Liu, M., Haghighi, K., Stroshine, R. and Ting, E. 1990. Mechanical properties of the soybean and failure strength of soybean. Trans.ASAE. 33(3): 559-566.
Mohsenin, N. N. 1984. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Pub. New York.
Paulsen, M. R. 1978. Fracture resistance of soybeans to compressive loading. Trans. ASAE. 21(6): 1210-1216.
Singh, K. and Goswami, T. 1998. Mechanical properties of cumin seed under compressive loading. J. Food Eng. 36, 311-321.